🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a national petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries